Notes for whoever works on this next, weighted toward what the code does not say: that the firmware is the reference and must never be edited to suit the emulator, that register layouts come from the vendor CMSIS header rather than inference, and that the way to find the next peripheral worth modelling is to watch where the firmware stops. Records the mistakes that already cost time here, each with the symptom that made it look like something else: GDB breakpoints halting the guest (which reads as 'the keypress does nothing'), writing the SysTick counter back while accelerating it (which hangs the delay loop outright), lowering the clock to speed up busy-waits (measured, 32x, nowhere near enough), unnamed qdev GPIO lines sharing one namespace, and a probe script whose own regex silently matched nothing. Also states plainly what the emulator cannot answer, so a passing test is not mistaken for evidence about radio behaviour.
6.1 KiB
Working on this repo
Notes for whoever picks this up next. Focused on what is not obvious from the code, and on mistakes that already cost time here.
What this is
A QEMU machine for the Puya PY32F071 (Cortex-M0+), so Quansheng UV-K5 V3 firmware runs on a PC. Boots to the main loop in ~5 s; the LCD is readable.
The machine and every device model live in one file, qemu/py32f071.c. That is
deliberate: the models are small and tightly coupled to each other's wiring, and
splitting them would spread the board layout out without making any of it
clearer.
Ground rules
Never edit the firmware to make the emulator work. The firmware is the reference. If something does not run, the model is wrong. A fix that changes firmware source makes every later test meaningless, because you are no longer testing what the radio runs.
Register layouts come from the vendor CMSIS header, not from a datasheet search and not from inference:
<firmware>/Drivers/CMSIS/Device/PY32F071/Include/py32f071xB.h
When you need a bit position, read it from there. Several details are
unintuitive — LL_ADC_FLAG_EOS is really ADC_SR_EOC on this part — and
guessing produces models that look right and hang.
Find the next thing to model by watching where the firmware stops, not by reading the datasheet front to back. Every peripheral here was added because the firmware demonstrably waited on it:
tools/where.sh 4 # sample the call stack a few times
A stack that repeats in the same function across samples is a spin loop. Look at what it reads.
How to run it
python3 tools/make_flash.py # once; builds assets/flash.img
tools/run.sh # GDB stub on :1234, QMP on /tmp/uvk5-qmp.sock
tools/where.sh # where execution is
tools/gpiob_dump.sh # GPIOB registers
python3 tools/key.py MENU # inject a keypress
python3 tools/screenshot.py --frame-addr 0x200013DC \
--status-addr 0x2000175C --port 1234 --out screen.png
Screenshot addresses move between firmware builds. Get the current ones with:
arm-none-eabi-nm firmware.elf | grep -E 'gFrameBuffer|gStatusLine'
Rebuild after editing the machine:
cd $QEMU/build && ninja qemu-system-arm # ~10 s incremental
Things that already went wrong
GDB breakpoints halt the guest. A key held across a breakpoint session is
never processed, because the main loop is not running. This produced a whole
round of "the keypress does nothing" that was really "the machine is stopped".
Use tools/press_and_shot.sh — it presses, lets the machine run, then reads the
framebuffer, with no breakpoints anywhere.
Do not write the SysTick counter back when accelerating it. Two attempts did
that. Each read re-anchored the count, so the value the firmware saw stopped
changing, its if (cur != prev) guard never fired, and the delay loop hung
outright — worse than the slowness being fixed. The working approach reports a
value that runs ahead of the real counter and leaves the timer alone.
Lowering the clock does not speed up delay loops. The bottleneck is loop iterations per second, not counter speed. 48 MHz to 200 Hz bought 32x and was nowhere near enough. Measured, not assumed.
Unnamed qdev in and out lines share one namespace. A device with both
unnamed qdev_init_gpio_in and qdev_init_gpio_out makes qdev_get_gpio_in()
ambiguous, and board wiring silently attaches to the wrong line. The GPIO model
uses "pin-in" and "pin-out" for this reason. Keep it that way.
Key hold times must be generous. Guest time runs fast, so 400 ms of wall
clock was too short for the firmware's debounce to complete. key.py holds for
2500 ms. If a press seems ignored, lengthen it before suspecting the wiring.
Verify a tool's own parsing before trusting its output. gpio_watch.py
reported IDR=0x0000 for several rounds because its regex did not match gdb's
output format at all. The register was fine; the reader was broken. Cross-check
with tools/gpiob_dump.sh, which uses a different path.
Known gap: the keypad
Keypresses reach the firmware but the UI does not react. What is established:
- The keypad model holds the right state (
qom-get pressreads back the key) - Row lines are driven: TRACE shows
row0 -> 0while MENU is held - The firmware's scan sees it: at the IDR read inside
KEYBOARD_Poll,ODR=033c IDR=7fbf— column 1 low, row 0 low KEYBOARD_Pollreturns 10, which isKEY_MENUindriver/keyboard.h
So the matrix works and the scan decodes correctly. Whatever is wrong is
downstream, in how app.c debounces or dispatches the returned key. That is
where to look — not at the wiring, which has been checked more than enough.
Useful here: tools/scan_trace.sh (what the scan reads), tools/key_result.sh
(what Poll returns), tools/trace_run.sh (the TRACE points, currently compiled
in).
There is fprintf(stderr, "TRACE ...") instrumentation in qemu/py32f071.c at
three points. Remove it once the keypad works.
What this cannot do
It reproduces what the firmware commanded — frequency, power step, carrier keying in time. It does not reproduce the analogue result: keying envelopes, spurious emissions, sensitivity.
That is not a gap to close later. The BK4819/BK4829 transceiver has no public datasheet, so its driver is the only specification available, and a driver tells you which registers were written, never what left the antenna. Those questions need a real radio and a spectrum analyser. Do not let anyone conclude otherwise from a passing emulator test.
Timing is also deliberately wrong — see the SysTick section in README.md. Fine for menus and control flow; useless for signal timing.
If you add a peripheral
- Read the register layout from the CMSIS header
- Model only what the firmware actually touches; the logging catch-all
(
py32-stub) shows you what that is - Watch for spin loops: any flag the firmware polls must be able to change, and
write-1-to-start bits (like
ADC_CR2_CAL) must never be stored set - Rebuild, run, and check with
tools/where.shthat the firmware moved past where it used to stop