key.py held every key for 2500 ms, on the assumption that guest time runs fast during delays so a press needs a long wall-clock hold. That is wrong for this path, and it is why the keypad looked dead. The two SysTick mechanisms are separate. poll-boost accelerates counter *reads* so SYSTICK_DelayUs converges; it does not speed up interrupt delivery. Interrupts drive SysTick_Handler -> gNextTimeslice -> APP_TimeSlice10ms -> CheckKeys at close to real time, so the firmware's thresholds hold in wall clock as written: 20 ms to register a press, 400 ms to count as held. 2500 ms is ~250 ticks, six times past the long-press threshold, so every press was dispatched as a hold. MAIN_Key_MENU acts only on a short release and returns early when bKeyHeld is set, so nothing happened. Confirmed by reading gDebounceCounter mid-hold: 317 after a 3 s hold, which also proves the timeslice was running all along. Now HOLD_MS=200 and LONG_HOLD_MS=900. Verified with screenshots: the menu opens and UP/DOWN move through it. Also here: - Drop the three TRACE fprintfs. They fired on every keypad poll and buried the console; the matrix is confirmed working. - Drop a redundant forward declaration of py32_spi_xfer_byte, silencing the only build warning. - Document the real remaining gap: power save (~6 s after boot) stops the keypad scan and the model does not wake from it. Includes the two dead ends already ruled out by experiment, so nobody repeats them. - Add README screenshots captured from guest memory.
12 KiB
Working on this repo
Notes for whoever picks this up next. Focused on what is not obvious from the code, and on mistakes that already cost time here.
What this is
A QEMU machine for the Puya PY32F071 (Cortex-M0+), so Quansheng UV-K5 V3 firmware runs on a PC. Boots to the main loop in ~5 s; the LCD is readable.
The machine and every device model live in one file, qemu/py32f071.c. That is
deliberate: the models are small and tightly coupled to each other's wiring, and
splitting them would spread the board layout out without making any of it
clearer.
Ground rules
Never edit the firmware to make the emulator work. The firmware is the reference. If something does not run, the model is wrong. A fix that changes firmware source makes every later test meaningless, because you are no longer testing what the radio runs.
Register layouts come from the vendor CMSIS header, not from a datasheet search and not from inference:
<firmware>/Drivers/CMSIS/Device/PY32F071/Include/py32f071xB.h
When you need a bit position, read it from there. Several details are
unintuitive — LL_ADC_FLAG_EOS is really ADC_SR_EOC on this part — and
guessing produces models that look right and hang.
Find the next thing to model by watching where the firmware stops, not by reading the datasheet front to back. Every peripheral here was added because the firmware demonstrably waited on it:
tools/where.sh 4 # sample the call stack a few times
A stack that repeats in the same function across samples is a spin loop. Look at what it reads.
How to run it
python3 tools/make_flash.py # once; builds assets/flash.img
tools/run.sh # GDB stub on :1234, QMP on /tmp/uvk5-qmp.sock
tools/where.sh # where execution is
tools/gpiob_dump.sh # GPIOB registers
python3 tools/key.py MENU # inject a keypress
python3 tools/screenshot.py --frame-addr 0x200013DC \
--status-addr 0x2000175C --port 1234 --out screen.png
Screenshot addresses move between firmware builds. Get the current ones with:
arm-none-eabi-nm firmware.elf | grep -E 'gFrameBuffer|gStatusLine'
Rebuild after editing the machine:
cd $QEMU/build && ninja qemu-system-arm # ~10 s incremental
Things that already went wrong
GDB breakpoints halt the guest. A key held across a breakpoint session is
never processed, because the main loop is not running. This produced a whole
round of "the keypress does nothing" that was really "the machine is stopped".
Use tools/press_and_shot.sh — it presses, lets the machine run, then reads the
framebuffer, with no breakpoints anywhere.
Do not write the SysTick counter back when accelerating it. Two attempts did
that. Each read re-anchored the count, so the value the firmware saw stopped
changing, its if (cur != prev) guard never fired, and the delay loop hung
outright — worse than the slowness being fixed. The working approach reports a
value that runs ahead of the real counter and leaves the timer alone.
Lowering the clock does not speed up delay loops. The bottleneck is loop iterations per second, not counter speed. 48 MHz to 200 Hz bought 32x and was nowhere near enough. Measured, not assumed.
Unnamed qdev in and out lines share one namespace. A device with both
unnamed qdev_init_gpio_in and qdev_init_gpio_out makes qdev_get_gpio_in()
ambiguous, and board wiring silently attaches to the wrong line. The GPIO model
uses "pin-in" and "pin-out" for this reason. Keep it that way.
Key hold times must be generous. Guest time runs fast, so 400 ms of wall
clock was too short for the firmware's debounce to complete. key.py holds for
2500 ms. If a press seems ignored, lengthen it before suspecting the wiring.
Verify a tool's own parsing before trusting its output. gpio_watch.py
reported IDR=0x0000 for several rounds because its regex did not match gdb's
output format at all. The register was fine; the reader was broken. Cross-check
with tools/gpiob_dump.sh, which uses a different path.
The keypad: two separate problems, one fixed
The old note here said "keys reach the firmware but the UI does not react" and pointed at the machine model. The model was not the problem. There were two independent causes, and only the first is fixed.
Fixed: key.py held keys far too long
tools/key.py was holding every key for 2500 ms.
The two SysTick mechanisms are separate, and conflating them caused this:
- SysTick interrupts fire at close to real time.
SysTick_HandlersetsgNextTimeslice, which gatesAPP_TimeSlice10ms->CheckKeys. So the debounce thresholds inApp/misc.capply in wall clock as written:key_debounce_10ms = 2(20 ms to register),key_repeat_delay_10ms = 40(400 ms counts as held). - The
poll-boostproperty accelerates SysTick counter reads, soSYSTICK_DelayUsconverges. It does not speed up interrupt delivery.
A 2500 ms hold is ~250 ticks, six times past the long-press threshold. Every
press was dispatched as a hold, and the handlers act on a short release:
MAIN_Key_MENU returns early at the if (bKeyHeld) branch and never opens the
menu. Confirmed by reading gDebounceCounter mid-hold — it stood at 317 after a
3 s hold, which both proves the timeslice is running and shows the hold was far
too long.
Current values in key.py: HOLD_MS = 200, LONG_HOLD_MS = 900. Verified end
to end — key.py MENU DOWN DOWN moves the menu from 01/79 to 03/79, and
key.py UP moves it back to 02/79.
If a press seems ignored, do not lengthen the hold. Check whether the handler
wanted a short press, and check gEeprom.KEY_LOCK (the LCD draws a padlock when
the keypad is locked, and ignoring keys is then correct behaviour).
Driving the menus: send a sequence as one burst
Three things will make a key sequence land somewhere you did not intend. All three cost time here.
gdb between presses halts the guest. Every gdb-multiarch -batch attach
stops the machine for its duration. Inspecting gMenuCursor after each press
stretches a six-press sequence past the 20 s menu timeout
(menu_timeout_500ms in App/misc.c), so the UI silently falls back to the main
screen and the rest of the presses tune the VFO instead of navigating. Send the
whole sequence in one Python burst over QMP, then read state once at the end.
UP/DOWN are inverted inside a submenu. MENU_Key_UP_DOWN flips Direction
when gIsInSubMenu and !gEeprom.SET_NAV (app/menu.c:2311). In the list DOWN
moves down; editing a value, UP decreases it. Values also clamp at
MENU_GetLimits rather than wrapping, so overshooting sticks at the limit.
MENU toggles rather than only entering. On the main screen a short MENU opens
the menu; in the list it enters the submenu; in a submenu it commits
(gFlagAcceptSetting = true) and steps back out. Two MENU presses in a row from
the list therefore enter and immediately leave, which looks like nothing
happened.
Numeric jump: typing a menu number in the list jumps straight to it, which beats
counting DOWN presses. Single digits are reliable. Two-digit entry needs both
presses inside the same input-box window, and MENU_Key_0_to_9 jumps and returns
as soon as the first digit is a valid index (app/menu.c:1826), so 3 then 0
lands on 3 rather than 30. Pre-positioning gMenuCursor with gdb, in one attach
right after opening the menu, is the reliable way to reach a distant entry.
Verified this way: menu opens, DOWN/UP move the list, MENU enters a submenu, and a digit selects a value. Screenshots confirmed BatSav at 30/79 showing OFF.
Known limitation: power save stops the keypad scan
The keypad works, but only while the radio is awake. Measured on a fresh boot:
gCurrentFunction is 0 (FUNCTION_FOREGROUND) until about 6 s, then becomes 5
(FUNCTION_POWER_SAVE) and the scan stops:
gRxIdleMode=1 gCurrentFunction=5
From then on KEYBOARD_Poll returns KEY_INVALID however long or often a key is
held — eight consecutive key.py MENU presses left gKeyReading0 at 19 and
gScreenToDisplay at 0. A real radio wakes on a keypress, so this is a gap in
the model rather than firmware behaviour. The suspect is the sleep/wake path in
HandlePowerSave, which calls BK4819_Sleep() and spins on BK4819_REG_0C
bit 0 over the bit-banged bus. Note that bus shares GPIOB with the keypad (bus on
PB8/PB9, columns PB3-PB6, rows PB12-PB15), and the model idles PB9 low as a
deliberate hack so those reads return zero — worth a look when someone picks this
up.
Working around it is easy and does not need the gap closed: any keypad activity
keeps the radio awake, and being in the menu blocks power save outright
(gScreenToDisplay != DISPLAY_MAIN guards the entry at app/app.c:1377). So
open the menu within the first few seconds of boot and a session stays usable
indefinitely. Turning BatSav off through the UI works too, though the setting
does not survive a restart — see below.
Two dead ends, both confirmed by experiment, so nobody repeats them:
- Patching battery save in
assets/flash.imgdoes nothing.SETTINGS_InitEEPROMcompares a version string at flash0x00A160, finds a mismatch on a fresh image, and writes the settings sector.PY25Q16_WriteBuffererases the whole 4 KB sector before reprogramming, so a byte planted at0x00A00Bis gone before the read atsettings.c:169sees it. - Guest-side settings changes do not persist. The emulated PY25Q16 loads the image into RAM at realize time and never writes back, so anything the firmware saves is lost on restart. Adding a flush would be the real fix if persistent settings are ever wanted.
Useful here: tools/scan_trace.sh (what the scan reads), tools/key_result.sh
(what Poll returns), tools/trace_run.sh (the TRACE points).
The three fprintf(stderr, "TRACE ...") probes that used to sit in
qemu/py32f071.c are gone -- they fired on every keypad poll and buried the
console. If you need them back while chasing the power save gap, they went in
py32_gpio_set_input, keypad_update_rows and keypad_col_changed; git log -p -- qemu/py32f071.c has the exact lines. grep -c 'keypad row0 -> 0' on the
captured stderr was how the matrix got confirmed working, and it is still the
quickest check that a press reaches the model.
Note the ELF at uvk5-sat/build/CW/nr7y.cw.elf carries no DWARF, so gdb reports
'gEeprom' has unknown type. Scalars work if you cast through their address
(*(unsigned short*)&gDebounceCounter); struct fields need manual offsets.
What this cannot do
It reproduces what the firmware commanded — frequency, power step, carrier keying in time. It does not reproduce the analogue result: keying envelopes, spurious emissions, sensitivity.
That is not a gap to close later. The BK4819/BK4829 transceiver has no public datasheet, so its driver is the only specification available, and a driver tells you which registers were written, never what left the antenna. Those questions need a real radio and a spectrum analyser. Do not let anyone conclude otherwise from a passing emulator test.
Timing is also deliberately wrong — see the SysTick section in README.md. Fine for menus and control flow; useless for signal timing.
If you add a peripheral
- Read the register layout from the CMSIS header
- Model only what the firmware actually touches; the logging catch-all
(
py32-stub) shows you what that is - Watch for spin loops: any flag the firmware polls must be able to change, and
write-1-to-start bits (like
ADC_CR2_CAL) must never be stored set - Rebuild, run, and check with
tools/where.shthat the firmware moved past where it used to stop